qatsi: (sewell)
It's use-it-or-lose-it season for annual leave at work, and I'm in favour of using it. We had intended to meet up with F late last year for a trip to Dulwich Picture Gallery, but our plans were upended by rail strikes. In the mean time, R had already visited the M K Čiurlionis: Between Worlds exhibition. As weekends are the new peak days, I decided a Friday trip would suit me, and it worked quite well. The exhibition space at Dulwich is long and narrow, and it doesn't take many people to make it busy, but it was fairly quiet when I arrived in the late morning.

The paintings were definitely other-worldly, reflecting Lithuanian history and culture, with significant pagan and eastern influences. But they were also familiar, with one or two angels being reminiscent of the recent BBC adaptation of His Dark Materials; and Serenity (below), whilst being quite different in detail, reminded me in structure of Bocklin's Isle of the Dead. I didn't see any mention of synesthesia, but Čiurlionis was also a composer, and gave musical titles such as "Sonata", "Symphony" or "Fugue" to several of his works.


Serenity



Creation of the World (V) - a watery Tattoine?



Sonata of the Sea (Finale) - perhaps inspired by The Great Wave off Kanagawa?



The City - as featured in any number of fantasy novels



Sonata of the Pyramids (Allegro)



After lunch, and back in central London, there was time to visit the Royal Academy's Spain and the Hispanic world exhibition. More of a conventional blockbuster, this exhibition takes items loaned from the Hispanic Society of America, while their museum undergoes renovation. Obviously this was a busier exhibition, but still probably less crowded than at a weekend. It's difficult to compare with the before-time, but I wondered whether there were fewer exhibits, as things did feel a bit more comfortably spaced out. The range and quality is impressive, from the Bell-Beaker artifacts of c.2400 BCE, through the culture of Al-Andalus, the colonial era in North and South America, culminating in some Sorolla paintings (readily recognisable in style from an earlier exhibition) and a sketch for his installed paintings Vision of Spain.


Bell-Beaker bowl



Plate with Dragon



Plate with Harpy



Black Book of Hours



Vespucci World Map



The Duchess of Alba, by Goya



Louis Comfort Tiffany, by Sorolla

qatsi: (baker)
We headed in to London today for the Science Fiction: Voyage to the Edge of Imagination exhibition at the Science Museum. The exhibition begins in a style reminiscent of the Doctor Who Experience, with an introduction by the AI agent, ALANN. Most of the exhibition comprises costumes and props from various sci-fi films and programmes over the years, from Frankenstein and Metropolis through Doctor Who, Star Trek and Star Wars, to more recent films. These are tied - sometimes tenuously - to scientific questions, such as the question of faster-than-light travel, cybernetics, the way we imagine other life forms, and the way we endanger ourselves and the only planet known to host life. A wall of NASA-sponsored travel posters based on Kepler and other exoplanet searches was also an enjoyable component. Mostly the exhibition steered clear of political questions - other than that of the environment - avoiding, for example, whether Daleks, Klingons, or other totalitarian aliens are just a representation of Nazis in our imagination. Thinking of Doctor Who specifically, questions about dimensional transcendentality or regeneration also have valid scientific lines of enquiry. Overall, it was a fun exhibition, and good to get out.

We also briefly took in the mathematical and information science sections in the main museum. I'd seen the fragment of Babbage's Analytical Engine before, but Scheutz's Difference Engine of 1859 was new. How typical of the Germans (it turns out that Scheutz was Swedish - ed) to steal our ideas and actually implement them.
qatsi: (capaldi)
Book Review: The Story of Crossrail, by Christian Wolmar
Whereas The Tunnel Through Time focused very much on the psychogeography and history of some inner London districts, Wolmar's book is closer to what I would expect, starting with the origins of the Underground routes across London and observing that North-South routes were established early on, but the city remained ambivalent about East-West routes, making do with the Metropolitan and District lines (elements of which were later united as the Circle line) and the piecemeal construction of the Central line. There's an illuminating discussion on the "objectiveness" of cost-benefit analysis, and the way various lobby groups have operated over the decades, which delayed getting Crossrail off even the vaguest of drawing boards prior to the 1990s. (The DLR and Jubilee line extension were both evaluated less favourably, yet were built earlier, due to influence from the owners of Canary Wharf. And that's before you consider similar projects outside of London.)

The later chapters of the book are more technical (though not specialist), focusing on the tunnelling, trains, stations and signalling - the last of these has been the principal cause of delay, and having read the book, it is easier to understand how this came about. Depending on one's point of view, this can be somewhat ascribed either to a chronic lack of investment in the railways, or EU bureaucracy. On the rolling stock, again, political interference trumps strict commercial considerations, where the bidding would have favoured overseas construction. On the stations, it is interesting to read about the TfL design ethos, somewhat at odds with conventions of the construction industry, but reassuringly in keeping with the iconic designs of the Tube over its history. Overall, we may be exercised by the cost overrun of about 20% (unknown at the time of writing), but Wolmar reasonably makes observations that overruns of 50-100% are not uncommon in projects of such scale (at least partially due to massaging of original estimates to get the project off the ground).

Apparently Lord Adonis wanted to call it the Churchill line but a certain Mayor of London had an infatuation for the monarch even greater than his infatuation for the wartime prime minister. Perhaps we should be grateful that it's opened in the jubilee year, rather than being delayed until yet another round-numbered VE-day anniversary.

This book was published in 2018, so although it has some awareness of the announcement of the delay, it doesn't cover what happened afterwards. One of the interesting aspects of cost-benefit analysis is the sensitivity of the "benefit" side to the state of the economy. Inevitably, a new scheme appears most favourable and is most needed when the economy is doing well; equally inevitably, it seems, by the time it has been constructed, some of the demand will have faded. The financial circumstances in which TfL finds itself in 2022 seem to follow this pattern. Wolmar points out that usage of most new transport schemes eventually exceed their estimates, though we may have to wait some time to find that out. Crossrail 2, if it ever goes ahead, is putatively to be called the Churchill line.
qatsi: (Default)
Book Review: London - A Life in Maps, by Peter Whitfield
Another volume from the exhibitions back-catalogue shelf, this time from the British Library's 2006-7 exhibition (I can't readily find a link in my archives, so maybe I didn't blog about it at the time). Being the British Library, this is quite a bookish volume, and furthermore, it is rather more a history of London's development than a catalogue of cartographic wonder. Nonetheless, it is interesting in quite a few ways: for one, the starting point for extant maps of London is well into the Middle Ages, with only a scattering of images before the sixteenth century, so anything earlier than that is down to archaeology. There are probably three very well-defined transformations in this context: the Great Fire, the advent of the railways, and the Blitz. The first of these offered paths not taken, to redevelop London along European fashions, but the complexity of land ownership and the weakness of the state prevented such radical change. The second saw the advent of the suburbs, with the already-linked London and Westminster spilling over into nearby villages. The third saw the removal of much of the eighteenth and nineteenth century architecture, often replaced with brutalist structures that have not always stood the test of time. The book also goes into details, though: the development of various aristocratic estates on the fringes of the city, the centres of vice in Southwark and the emergence of the pleasure gardens, mostly south of the river; the circumlocutions of royalty from one London location to another; the later replacement and conversions of riverside houses and palaces into hotels; the rise and fall of the docks. Interesting, if not perhaps quite as visually oriented as the title might suggest.
qatsi: (capaldi)
A few weeks ago, as outdoor attractions started to re-open, we booked tickets to go to RHS Wisley. Of course, the weather had other ideas, but in fact it wasn't too bad. There was a short queue, but it was self-managing with 2m points clearly marked on the ground, and the entry through the small indoor area was quite swift.

It's many years since we visited - I reckon it could easily be 15 or 20 - and I think a lot has changed. Last time we visited was in autumn; this time we got to see mid-summer. Although the glasshouses were closed, we had a good wander through most of the outdoor areas, and I picked up a couple of tips in the trials area. In these times I can't say it was a stress-free visit, but common sense generally prevailed and I didn't feel uneasy at any stage, though we avoided the shop (not least because it had its own queue).



The Laboratory





The Walled Garden





Gunnera





Sweet Peas





Bonsai





Sarracenia

qatsi: (bach)
We headed in to London on Sunday afternoon for an early evening concert by The Bach Players at St John's Smith Square. The venue was certainly seasonally chilly. The first half, as the programme was announced, comprised music for Christmas from the Catholic tradition of Austria and Italy: Biber, Tarquinio Merula, Claudio Merulo, Giacomo Carissimi, and Corelli. Most of the names and almost all of the music was new to me - only Corelli's Christmas Concerto was vaguely familiar. The Merulo, an organ solo Toccata ottava, perhaps sounded reminiscent of the Gabrieli family. For the second half the programme switched to Lutheran Germany, and two cantatas by J S Bach: most appropriately, the second part of the Cantata for the first Sunday in Advent, BWV36, and Cantata for the second day of Christmas, BWV57.

In search of necessary sustenance, we retired to the Red Lion on Whitehall, a haunt for MPs with its own division bell (which we failed to spot). Now a chain pub, the food was decent but standard, and it was disappointing that they were out of Corporal Jones Toad in the Hole, making me wonder what "adequate" food supplies await in the coming months.
qatsi: (urquhart)
Last Wednesday, the news broke that Boris Johnson had asked the Queen to prorogue Parliament for a 5-week period. Among the first 50000 or so to sign the inevitable petition against, I felt this was a necessary but not sufficient action, and decided to join the hastily-convened protest at College Green in the evening. The sound system wasn't really up to the job, but among others I heard Diane Abbott convincingly describe how the UK would conventionally react to such a democratic suspension in a Latin American country. We moved on to Parliament Square and Downing Street, where other, similarly chaotic protests, were going on. The mood was distinctly different from earlier People's Vote marches, much angrier, and although I did not feel unsafe, I had the sense that we have entered a more dangerous phase, and I was not surprised to hear of clashes with Brexit Party supporters later in the evening.

Downing Street, 28th August 2019



By the weekend, things had become more organised; as I was planning on going to the Proms on Saturday evening, I decided to join the lunchtime protest at Westminster in lieu of the more local protests taking place. In some respects, this was a disappointment, as it was clearly led by the hard left, and the speakers were all either from the Labour Party, the Green Party, or the Unions. John McDonnell made a reasoned speech; some of the Trades Union reps were off-message to my ear, almost overtly suggesting that Corbyn be made head of a caretaker government, at which point he could implement Labour's policies, including the more far-left ones. It pleased the crowd, but that wouldn't be any more constitutional than the present position. Fortunately the loudest booing during the speeches was reserved for the moment when the Vauxhall Labour Party chair mentioned that his MP was Kate Hoey; I'm not sure whether that was the expected reaction.

Despite the arrangement for a "static" demonstration, we had to exit somewhere, and people marched up Whitehall to Trafalgar Square. Enough time had passed for people to be inventive about their placards; I only got poor photos of the light-hearted "More Pierogi, Less Prorogation" or the less subtle Boris Johnson picture with added Hitler moustache, but there were others too.



There was further booing and shouting as we passed the Wetherspoon's pub on Whitehall; as we got closer I realised that a few of Britain's Finest Gammon were being contained by a heavy police presence.

I could see the traffic was being disrupted as I made my way to the National Gallery for a couple of hours to pass the remainder of the afternoon; as I emerged it seemed police were moving in to break up the sit-down protest.


qatsi: (Default)
The latest anti-Brexit march - No to Boris, Yes to Europe - sneaked up with a lower profile and had a slightly different theme to previous events, triggered in part by the Conservative party's leadership election. We assumed it would be less busy than the previous march; in that we were correct, and arriving just about midday meant we spent less time hanging around, but it was still quite busy. We noticed quite a few sellers of merchandise; no doubt Peter Tatchell has written an article somewhere condemning the commercialisation of these events. The weather turned out much better than predicted and as a result, despite regular hydration, I had a headache last night, and this morning discovered quite a sunburnt neck.

We found ourselves close to the front of the Lib Dem group, which was still towards the back of the march and took about an hour to get going. Like Brexit itself, PlacardWatch seemed to be running out of steam; although there were some topical slogans in Latin (literally, "Brexiters, go home!"), and Cats against Brexit. We did, at least, make it to Parliament Square this time; but the square itself was full, Billy Bragg was on stage, and we couldn't find any agenda or list of likely speakers, so we decided to call it a day. Pending the collapse of the government in the interim (and who would bet against that?), we'll be back in October.
qatsi: (urquhart)
We set off early for the Put it to the People march. For once the trains were not sabotaged by Failing Grayling, and we found [personal profile] uitlander successfully at the meeting point. Unfortunately my path failed to coincide with a couple of other friends I was hoping to meet, but I understand they both were on sections of the march.

We assembled onto Park Lane at 11:30. Predictably, there was a lot of standing around; we could do little but fight with the mobile networks and admire the placards. Like last time, it was gone 2pm before we passed the official starting point of the march. The pace seemed about the same as last time, though the march did not thin out the way previous events have. We parted company with [personal profile] uitlander, who wanted to stick with the group for the return coach. Despite a strong contender from some bagpipes playing Beethoven's Ode to Joy, the surreal high point was probably passing alongside a Yorkshire party belting out "Thar Brexit deal is crap" to the tune of Ilkley Moor. In fact, it did take us longer to reach the end; it was about quarter to five when we reached Trafalgar Square and dispersed. Sadly we saw no speeches. Such is the price for being part of the 1,000,000.

For me, the mood felt darker than previous marches. Some of that may have been down to anxiety, either generally, or specifically about not being able to fulfil meeting arrangements with other friends, but for the most part I think the reason is the more obvious reality. The petition, to revoke Article 50, seems to exemplify the radicalisation of Remainers: despite the stated objective of the march, which reflects the logic that the 2016 referendum decision is best amended by a further referendum on the actual deal, the sense that these people want Article 50 revoked was strong. Whilst she made some bad errors of judgement on Wednesday evening, Theresa May was right to say we have all had enough. It's just that she hasn't, so far, allowed MPs to say what they are in favour of, though they have had ample opportunities to vote things down.

Where do we go from here? It's difficult to guess, though I think we can guess that MV3 will fail, if it is put at all. It feels as though the indicative votes should either lock the current deal into a referendum, or dispatch Article 50 altogether, with the men in white coats, or John Bercow, taking May away for her own good and everyone else's; but Parliament has, so far, excluded the overtly sensible options. Longer term, we need some inquiry to hold those who peddled lies and fantasies to account, and we also need something like a Royal Commission to consider parameters and rules for whether - if ever - we are to have referendums in this country in future.

Cross Rail

Mar. 16th, 2019 11:47 am
qatsi: (crescent)
Book Review: The Tunnel Through Time - A New Route for an Old London Journey, by Gillian Tindall
This book themed around the Elizabeth Line, which of course should have been open for several months by now, but currently isn't expected to open until 2020. It's a history of some districts of London, focused on the route mostly from Tyburn to Stepney, and mostly focused on the medieval period through to the nineteenth century. As such it's a bit disappointing, because it chops off both ends of the line; even Paddington barely gets a mention, never mind Slough, Maidenhead or Reading, and the routes out to Shenfield and Abbey Wood are largely omitted too. But what remains is interesting, describing the once genteel area of Stepney and Mile End; the more colourful history of the St Giles area; the trials and tribulations of Railway Mania, failing for some time to penetrate into the City itself, until Fenchurch Street station arrived, promptly followed by Liverpool Street. There were great plans for a terminus in the Farringdon area, and the station will become an increasingly important hub as the interchange between the Elizabeth Line and Thameslink, as well as the Underground. In more recent times, the dubious charting of "progress" is recorded, with shady deals and plans justified in the name of slum and/or bomb site clearances giving rise to developments such as Centre Point. The book weaves erratically, taking neither a geographical nor a chronological path; although there are a handful of illustrations, there are also some tantalising references to old maps which sadly are not reproduced in the book.

QCon

Mar. 10th, 2019 04:47 pm
qatsi: (wally)
Previously, when asked at work if I want to go to any conferences, I've been indifferent; this year, somehow, I agreed to go to QCon London and so I spent three days away from work, if not away from London, last week. Having worked with two of the speakers - Sarah Wells, who gave the opening keynote presentation, and Nicky Wrightson - gave me some familiarity, as well as a chance to catch up with friends. Trying to mix familiar and unfamiliar, I also attended talks on Test-Driven Machine Learning, Life Beyond Java 8, Open Banking, Reactive Architecture, High-Performance Culture, Functional Composition, and the final keynote on Bad Science, Better Data by Ben Goldacre. It was intensive and exhausting; although there was ample time for breaks, it didn't really feel like down-time. At the best of times I'm not cut out for "networking", and this wasn't the best of times either. Nevertheless I did enjoy the conference and would recommend it to others in the profession.
qatsi: (urquhart)
I probably wouldn't have made the effort to venture in to London yesterday for the People's Vote Rally, but as I work there, it seemed logical to take advantage of the opportunity. Scheduled for 4-7pm, I decided there was no need to get there early, and headed towards Westminster after work. As I emerged from the tube station, I saw people heading towards the station with placards, clearly leaving the rally, but it didn't bother me; the timing suggested people were quite likely to come and go as worked best for them. I was a bit more concerned that there might be a significant Leave presence, and that I might find it difficult to ensure I was in the right crowd, but that turned out not to be an issue. (In any case, arguing for a second referendum that takes account of the result of the negotiations isn't strictly taking a position one way or the other.)

It was a much smaller gathering than weekend daytime marches, though still well attended; I had no difficulty getting a spot on the grass at Parliament Square and arrived in time to hear speeches from some of the usual suspects (Chuka Umunna, Anna Soubry - described by the event hosts as a "bloody difficult woman", though I'm sure she's been called worse, and Alastair Campbell), and from some new faces (Ian Blackford, Jason Isaacs and Kevin Whately). A modest contingent of Leave Means Leave paraded through the rally at one point, with a close police presence; this didn't provoke any trouble, just rather louder chanting by most of the crowd in favour of a People's Vote.

The big screens at the event switched over to the BBC Parliament channel at around 7pm. We'd heard that there would be only two votes. The first seemed to take an awfully long time, presumably because the tellers don't often have to count 600 in one lobby; the second, main vote, was a bit quicker. I think it's fair to say I wasn't alone in being surprised by the size of the defeat. It was rather surreal to be in front of one of the big screens, watching a larger-than-life John Bercow bellowing "Order!" as if at the euphoric crowd. I watched May's "Come and have a go - if you think you're hard enough" challenge to Corbyn, his characteristically self-inflated response, and decided it was time to leave, managing to arrive back home at a sensible hour.

It's difficult to see where we go from here; Corbyn has already, predictably, lost the confidence vote. In any case, a General Election with Corbyn's current no-policy policy wouldn't solve anything. I don't recall 2016 being a particularly good year, so I'm not persuaded that the "will of the people" from 2016 should trump the "will of the people" in 2019. Why not ask them?
qatsi: (Default)
Another weekend, another People's Vote March. We decided not to bother getting up early, and took our time, arriving at Marble Arch around noon, which was the announced starting time. We shuffled, slowly. Very slowly. Much more slowly than last time. In fact, at about half past one, I commented that we had reached the bus stops where we met P on the March for Europe more than 18 months ago. It was well after 2pm by the time we got going. Even then, the pace was much slower than previous events, and the crowd never thinned out in its density. It was nearly 4pm by the time we reached Trafalgar Square; there seemed no prospect of progressing to the march's end-point in Parliament Square, and the crowds were milling. We decided it was time to call it a day, but realistically we'd have missed any speeches anyway.

It turned out that we were among 600,000 - 700,000 other people - or, as Channel 4 News announced it, the largest march in the UK ever to take place without Jeremy Corbyn. That was much, much bigger than the previous events, and explains the overall laggardliness.

Placard-wise, things were plainly getting quite serious. I hope the government is listening.



qatsi: (Default)
After a hectic week following a holiday, I could have done with a rest this weekend, but we had decided to go on the People's Vote march, so we headed back in to London yesterday. Fortunately the trains were, for once, running more or less as advertised, and it was a smooth journey to our meeting point off Pall Mall.

Like last year's march, there was a long wait before we actually moved, and a lot of it was more like shuffling than marching. In the mean time we had a short address from Vince Cable, encouraging us for the metaphorical Long March ahead. PlacardWatch spotted some goodies, such as BREXIT IS NOT MY CUP OF TEA, BLUE FLAGS NOT BLUE PASSPORTS, or DR STRANGEMOGG. With an honorary mention for the obligatory DOWN WITH THIS SORT OF THING placard we saw later in the day, Best in Show award goes to the woman with the Sergeant Wilson stamp: JUST GET ON WITH BREXIT? DO YOU THINK THAT'S WISE, SIR?.

Despite the slow pace, we arrived at Parliament Square just as the speeches were beginning, and although there were intermittent microphone problems, the speeches themselves were well prepared and delivered. The focus was not to dispute the result of the 2016 referendum, but to call upon the government to allow the people to make an informed choice based on the result of Brexit negotiations. As well as Vince Cable (again), Caroline Lucas, Tony Robinson, Peter Tatchell, David Lammy and Anna Soubry, we heard from road hauliers, doctors, and young people. The dismal leadership of both the government and the so-called opposition was highlighted unequivocally by all speakers on the platform, and at regular intervals throughout the speeches, there crowd broke into spontaneous chants of "Where's Jeremy Corbyn?".
qatsi: (sewell)
On Saturday we headed out to Dulwich Picture Gallery for their Tove Jansson exhibition. Although it's a relatively small exhibition space, sometimes I think they squeeze a lot into it, but not so much this time. There are plenty of Moomin pictures and related items, and appropriately Nordic illustrations for Swedish language editions of other works such as The Hobbit, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, and The Hunting of the Snark, but it was Jansson's paintings such as Mysterious Landscape and The Family and drawings in the first two rooms that I found most striking, as well as a curious miscellany of propaganda works including wartime covers for Garm magazine and, in the last room, poster designs for environmental campaigns.
qatsi: (crescent)
The Print Site Tour is an unusual work perk, and it is highly coveted. This week I was lucky enough to get a last-minute place. After an introductory session in the office, which explained the process of producing and adjusting the colour separations, and transferring the files to the presses worldwide, we headed off to deepest Stratford. St Clements Press (the sign on the building had no apostrophe; it seems to be a movable feast, as the LSE history has one) sounds to me like a codeword, as if one shouldn't know exactly what is printed there, but in fact it is the name of a separate company acquired by the FT years ago which has printed the FT and other papers for a long time. However, the Guardian's print operation, next door, was not so discreet about its mission.

After another induction, we toured the factory, seeing among others, the places where the paper rolls are loaded, the printing plates are produced (by what is essentially a giant laser printer producing lithographs on aluminium plates), and the paper folded and collated. It was a fascinating if noisy hour or so. Print media is in decline and it seems inevitable that one day it will disappear altogether, though there's no suggestion that will happen in the near future.


The paper rolls are about 2km long. This machine joins them together so there's no stoppage when the roll runs out.


Stop Press!
One of the plates was in the wrong way around. This doesn't matter much so long as it's discovered early, because the first few hunderd copies are binned anyway. It takes time for the machinery to warm up and for the print quality to become acceptable.


The presses running.


The magical folding machine. All pages have to arrive in alignment, so they can be combined here. Lots of adjustable rollers control the length of run for each roll.


Hot off the press.


Journalism in motion.
qatsi: (baker)
I pass Old Oak Common depot on the way to work every day. Sometimes I'm getting a little extra shut-eye, but sometimes I look out of the window, and one day, a few months ago, I saw a banner advertising an open day at the depot just outside Paddington. I decided it would be something a bit different to do, and bought myself a ticket for the event, which took place yesterday. Billed as celebrating 111 years of the depot, and featuring "Legends of the Great Western", it was in fact something of an inflection, with the imminent introduction of the IET electric trains on the Great Western line, and the re-purposing of the site to function as the depot for the Elizabeth Line (Crossrail) trains.


The website proclaimed "We expect demand for this event to be high" and the directions for getting to the depot suggested "we expect queues to form in two directions". They weren't wrong. After catching the train in to Paddington and backtracking along the Bakerloo Line to Willesden Junction, I found myself shortly after 10am in a slowly moving queue. There were some disturbing people who knew the Up and Down speed limits as we crossed the bridge over the West Coast Main Line, which also passes nearby. There was also the guy who worked for Network Rail who observed the irony that he has to fly from London for meetings in Edinburgh because the train is too slow and expensive. All in all it was a half-hour shuffle to get through the gates.


Once inside, the main attractions were, obviously, the locomotives, mostly from the BR diesel era but with some older steam locomotives, and one, very special, visitor: 60163 Tornado.



Those who take these things more seriously were constantly jostling for photo positions, and didn't hold back from instructing others to "get out of the way". For the most part, I think it was good-natured, though obviously some would have preferred access to the site without the inconvenience of other people. At the modern end of the spectrum, there was one of the new Class 800 series, Queen Elizabeth II. I do feel there's something missing. Just painting the name on the surface feels a bit indifferent from a polished nameplate, but that's the modern rail system for you. We weren't allowed inside, so it remains a mystery for a little while longer.


All in, it was a fun few hours, and we were lucky with the weather.

Inter alia

Aug. 20th, 2017 04:46 pm
qatsi: (sewell)
I had a short-list for filling time in the afternoons prior to the Proms, quite literally for a rainy day. The forecast for Thursday wasn't good though it turned out fine in the end. The Bank of England Museum is only open during the week, so I haven't generally had the opportunity to visit it, but it's not far from work. I generally avoided the interactive exhibits, though from what I could hear, there weren't many budding economists among the younger visitors trying them out. Nonetheless the story of the Bank is well laid out with some interesting prints and artefacts, and I did try out lifting and holding the carefully monitored gold bar (value somewhere around £400,000) - as well as the novelty value, it makes the point that at 13kg it can't simply be thrown around the way it often has been in crime films.

Conversely, Friday's forecast kept changing and in the end it was a wise move to spend time indoors, so I headed to The Queen's Gallery Canaletto exhibition. This was quite busy, but the ghost of Alan Coren can be assured that it did convey the feeling of being in Waitrose rather than Sainsbury's. There are works by a range of artists in the exhibition, which celebrates the collection purchased by George III from Joseph Smith in 1762. The highlight of the exhibition is the room containing the twelve views of the Grand Canal, Venice, as well as a series of views of Rome, but there are also pencil drawings (some of them quite rough in style, attractive but different to Canaletto's well-known style), capricci fictions, and sketches for the stage.
qatsi: (sewell)
We'd known the Hokusai exhibition at the British Museum would be popular and we'd booked in advance; just as well, as advance tickets have now sold out, and day tickets had also sold out when we arrived. There were long queues for the museum as a whole now that the bag search has become ubiquitous - having a pre-booked ticket allows you to fast-track through some elements of this, but it's still hassle. Sadly it's an arms race of security theatre - if one place does it, they all have to do it for fear of being left behind, a softer target. It's job creation all right, but I rather doubt these are quality jobs.

We had allowed plenty of time and wandered through the free, smaller exhibitions of British Watercolours, which was a mixed bag but had some interesting pieces by Paul Nash, his brother John Nash, Ravilious and others, and Pacific North America, marking the 150th anniversary of the foundation of Canada in a possibly rather awkward way, but at least acknowledging the indigenous culture.

The Hokusai exhibition itself was very busy, essentially a slow-moving queue from end to end, which didn't make for the best experience, but it was worth it to see the range of works, starting with the summoning of a dragon, proceeding through many views of Mount Fuji (including the Great Wave itself), but also flower and bird paintings, a few portraits, and two unusual aerial views of Japan and China. It was interesting to compare with Hiroshige's slightly later paintings of Mount Fuji; on the whole, Hokusai was more monochromatic, frequently using (the then novel) Prussian Blue for his main colour scheme. At the end of the exhibition there are also one or two works by his daughter; sometimes these were passed off as by Hokusia himself in order to increase their value.
qatsi: (urquhart)
We were on holiday in Portugal when news of the Grenfell Tower fire broke. As such, we probably didn't get the wall-to-wall coverage a major incident in London would provide to a domestic audience, although we certainly gleaned the grim details and the abject failure by the Prime Minister in visiting emergency services but not victims. (In contrast, the Queen did visit; but I don't think that's especially comparable. She's explicitly not a political figure and her privilege - like it or not - stems from a different provenance. Though I do wonder whether the folk memory of the bombing of Buckingham Palace in World War 2 - and the 1992 Windsor Castle fire - might have played their part.) Blair or Cameron, or even Brown, would have done better.

May's role, however, just reminded me more and more of Francis Urquhart in The Final Cut. When it was first broadcast in 1995, I felt it was a weak final instalment of the trilogy; the contemptuous attitudes of Urquhart and his government had gone beyond satire. I re-watched it this weekend, and it no longer seems so unbelievably bitter, because we all know that life itself has gone beyond satire in the last year or so. Urquhart's undoing is the death of a schoolgirl in a shoot-out between British troops and a paramilitary group in Cyprus, in a situation brought about directly as a result of his orders to the armed forces, which in turn is indirectly intended to benefit himself financially.

Neither the poor owner of the faulty fridge-freezer nor the manufacturer can be held responsible for the resulting inferno beyond a single flat; what idiocy produced a process that allowed the building to be refurbished with the materials that were used? I imagine the local council's motivation was cost-cutting rather than malevolence (and, as I don't know the chronology, they may be able to claim they were using cladding on the basis that other councils had used it too); but it inevitably brings to mind the corruption of T Dan Smith. The council plainly had no effective plan for a major incident that required re-housing, either. Unlike Urquhart, this tragedy isn't May's fault personally; but May has played her part in creating the culture that has allowed it to happen. It seems to me that her legacy is already set: the wheels are coming off, one aspect of the country after another (security, housing, NHS) falling apart after years of austerity and weakening of safeguards.

Profile

qatsi: (Default)
qatsi

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags